Literature Searching: Ethical Nursing Considerations

Words: 2741

Medicine

15th Feb, 2024

Ethical Nursing Practices
Search strategy
PRISMA Flowchart
The Research Critique Framework
Potential Implications
Conclusion
Reference list

Ethical values are vital in the nursing field as they facilitate the provision of quality care. In the United Kingdom, the considerations needed to give safe, legal, and moral aid are based on guidelines outlined by the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) under the NMC Code (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2018). It helps caregivers consider victims’ needs from different angles while maintaining a healthy recovery environment. The guidelines help nurses understand the importance of treating all patients equally while still protecting their privacy rights. Moral consideration is vital among all medics regardless of the practice area. A solid foundation that is needed to make sound choices is established with the presence of these ethical principles.

According to Ellis (2020), ethics are the moral obligations that guide an individual’s behavior, helping them distinguish between wrong and right. Nursing is a profession focused on providing care and encompasses the prevention of sicknesses and promoting health (Grant, Goodman, and Bach, 2019). In the research by Haahr et al. (2019), nursing ethics is defined as the discipline which focuses on addressing sound features of the fostering practice. Nurses are trained to care for the injured or sick (Ilkafah, Mei Tyas, and Haryanto, 2021). Ethical considerations in nursing are principles and values that guide health practitioners in decision-making concerning better care provision (Haahr et al., 2019).

This paper’s primary focus will be on the justification and understanding of how literature is searched with close reference to the ethical nursing considerations topic. The outline of the subjects to e covered thoroughly throughout the paper includes contextual information on moral practitioner deliberations, a description of how the literature search is conducted, and a research critique framework. Other segments to be discussed are the importance of literature searching and appraisal in nursing and a summary of the main points under the conclusion.

Ethical Nursing Practices

Nurses must find balance while providing patient care, which can be promoted by adhering to ethics. The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) was formulated in 2001 by the Health Act 1999 to regulate nurses, midwives, and nursing associates (Connell et al., 2022). The NMC Code sets the guidelines for ethical nursing care. Its primary function is directing all practitioners on the professional motives to uphold while providing treatment. Four core principles guide the ethical considerations in the NMC Code: prioritise people, practise effectively, preserve safety, and promote professionalism and trust (Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2018). Many healthcare facilities, medical centres, and hospitals have ethics committees to resolve moral conflicts and dilemmas (Stievano and Tschudin, 2019). The International Council of Nursing (ICN) performs similar functions to the NMC globally. It has a steering committee that revises the ethical guidelines set (Stievano and Tschudin, 2019). Medical practitioners are responsible for identifying and recognising moral setbacks affecting patients and the staff.

The ‘ethical nursing practices’ topic is critical to caregiving as it outlines the strategies for providing quality care. They include caregiving, moral resilience, distress and courage, advocacy, and end-of-life issues (Varkey, 2021). Morale is improved, and risks that arise from unethical practices are reduced when a culture of morality customs gets established (Aveyard and Sharp, 2017; Haahr et al., 2019). This literature search aims to explore various scholarly articles from different databases focusing on ethical nursing guidelines, thus helping get the best available information.

Search strategy

The literature search was conducted by providing a straightforward review question that formed the basis of the analysis. Various databases and search engines were used on the internet where specific articles were identified after keying in some terms. The question that guided the literature review was: what is the importance of the moral guidelines stated under the NMC Code in the United Kingdom? The search terms used to help identify the relevant sources include professional ethics, dilemmas in medicine, nursing, ethical consideration, healthcare morality, and the code of ethics for nurses. GoogleScholar was the primary search engine used to identify the scholarly articles related to the topic, and the databases used included PubMed, JSTOR, and ScienceDirect.

Applying inclusion and exclusion criteria made it easy to identify the most valuable research studies and those with minimal information related to the topic, making them invaluable. The two standards were determined after stating the literature review question and before more research was started. Scoping searches were conducted to further determine appropriate sources by gaining an overview of the depth of the analysis undertaken in the studies. The encompassing basis stated all the information a research work needed before getting included. Factors that would make a source ineligible were identified under the exclusion scale. The standard criteria used in both were: language, relevance, redundancy, publication, and scholarly review. The language used in the studies should be English; those in foreign were excluded. Research works with any form of duplicity were excluded from the consideration. Accepted research articles were those published within five years. Peer-reviewed sources were highly considered as they consisted of information vetted and analysed by other professionals in the field.

The number of papers identified to be reviewed was 30, which went through the stages like screening and eligibility tests. Some were excluded at each stage if they failed to meet the expected criteria.

PRISMA Flowchart

Eight research works were removed before the screening process as they were considered old studies. Required journals must be current and issued within the last five years. The remaining were screened using the title and abstract, eliminating two sources as they failed to display information vital to the topic. Twenty remaining articles were retrieved and thoroughly scanned as full texts. Three reports were excluded as no full texts of the stated sources existed for free. There was a need to pay to get full access to the articles, which was a challenge. Given the nature of the study, the abstract information was not sufficient.

Complete scanning was conducted on the remaining articles before including the potential sources in the systematic review. The following reasons resulted in eliminating some reports: redundancy, setting, and language. As a result, five papers that had duplicate data with minor changes in some sections were excluded. Three journals had participants outside the desired location, a healthcare facility, thus making them ineligible. The language barrier was witnessed as some articles were written in foreign languages, and only the abstract and title were in English. Preferred reports were written in American or British English for easy understanding and analysis. After excluding those that lacked relevance, the six desired works were identified and were to be used in the review.

The Research Critique Framework

	Paper 1 Ilkafah, Mei Tyas and Haryanto (2021)	Paper 2 Stievano and Tschudin (2019)	Paper 3 Varkey (2021)
Is there a clear link between the title, abstract and content?	Yes. The article’s title is good as it suggests the phenomena getting studied. The paper lacks an abstract, but there is a clear link between the title and the content.	Yes. The title relates to the abstract and content presented in the research work. The abstract contains a summary of the code of ethics, later elaborated more within the body of the paper.	Yes. There is a clear link between the title, the abstract, and the content. The title highlights what the paper talks about, while the abstract summarises the themes that comprise the paper’s content.
Are the authors credible?	Yes. The authors have attained a master’s degree in nursing and are all lecturers.	Yes. The author is a lecturer at the College of Wisconsin in the medicine department.	Yes. The author is an associate director for Nursing and Health Policy of the International Council of Nurses.
Is the rationale for undertaking the research clearly outlined?	Yes. The importance of the topic to be studied is identified under the background section. A reader or researcher can identify the benefits likely to be attained from reading the paper.	Yes. The introduction section summarises the importance of a physician making correct decisions. A rationale for why the study needs to be conducted to identify clinical ethics is thus presented.	Yes. The author indicates why the specified topic is relevant and how its knowledge is crucial to the nursing profession concerning providing quality patient care, thus promoting human rights.
Is the aim of the research clearly stated?	Yes. The aim of the study is presented in the background section. From it, a reader can foresee what is expected within the research study’s body.	Yes. The abstract section presents what is to be covered within the paper. This short presentation summarises what the article focuses on in a single sentence.	Yes. The purpose of the policy paper is presented in the abstract section. It enables one to know what the content of the study will focus on within the body.
What is the methodology used, and is a rationale for this provided?	Yes. A rationale for choosing the analytic survey method with a cross-sectional study is provided. It was conducted to identify the factors impacting the nurses from delivering quality services to patients.	No. The author adopted secondary research and provided no rationale on why they chose this form.	No. The author adopted the secondary research method under which existing data was used but no rationale is provided to explain why it was used.
Is the selection of participants (sampling method) identified?	Yes. Under the design and methods section, the author indicates that the selected participants were recruited using simple random sampling. The researcher further shows what population was used as potential participants for the study.	No. The author did not identify the sampling method they used in selecting the six cases from the specific resource book. Additionally, there were no participants in the research but only in case studies.	No. The nature of the study did not require the involvement of any participants to attain its objective. As a result, no sampling method was used as participants’ presence was irrelevant.
Is it clear how data were collected?	Yes. Data used in the research was collected using questionnaires focused on caring behaviour. The questionnaires were adapted from the New Zealand Nurse Association and Watson Caring Science Institute.	No. The information used in facilitating the research was acquired from already complete cases. The case studies were already comprehensive; hence no need to collect new data from the individuals.	No. Since no participants were involved, the data collection is not presented in the study. The information presented in the study was a result of secondary research.
Is an in-depth description of the data analysis process described?	Yes. The data collected was analysed through tables, and critical discussions of the findings presented. The analysis was provided to help determine how the results facilitated the attainment of the set aim of the study.	No. Despite there being data that was used in the research, there was an in-depth analysis of the presented information but only highlights how they portray the aspects getting studied	No. Given the nature of the study, no data was collected from any participants that needed analysis. As a result, the research lacked any data analysis process.
Can the findings be transferred/generalised to other populations or settings?	Yes. The study incorporated a sample that gave out information that was analysed and findings presented. The results are appropriate and accurate and can be generalised to other settings or populations related to medicine.	No. Since the paper did not incorporate first-hand information from a particular sample or specific setting, no findings are appropriate enough to be shared.	No. The paper lacked any findings as no sample was involved in acquiring data to be analysed. There are no results that can be transferred to other populations.
Is the conclusion supported by the findings?	Yes. The conclusion outlines the vital information from the paper, including the significant findings of the analysis made from the acquired data the participants gave.	No. The conclusion gives an overview of what was covered in the research work, emphasising the main points. The ending did not rely much on the study’s findings since the results were non-existent.	No. The study’s unique structure excluded methodology and discussion, hence the absence of results. The conclusion restates the importance of the stated ethics as presented within the body of the article.

Potential Implications

A literature search is vital in identifying potential sources for a specified topic, and the appraisal helps distinguish between valuable reports and those with low-quality information. It provides insight into how previous scholars studied a subject (Bramer et al., 2018). It helps recognise opportunities, detect shortcomings, and interpret data (Bramer et al., 2018). Through it, it was possible to identify sources and past researches that focused on identifying ethical nursing considerations. The impacts of evaluating the literature sources include reducing the burden of study by allowing one to focus on more relevant articles with high-quality information related to ethics in nursing. Through this, the number of vital works directly related to the principles of ethics in nursing was reduced to six from the potential thirty papers.

Nursing is a broad topic and contains varying information that can be included in current research from past works. Adopting a literature inquiry is crucial as it will help identify all articles, reports, and other relevant sources (Bramer et al., 2018). It enables one to scan and only select works directly linked to nursing and not any other discipline. It provides insight into how previous researchers studied the field, which is vital in recognising opportunities. Critical appraisal here is relevant in eliminating weak nursing studies. It further helps distinguish evidence from opinions, beliefs, and assumptions, especially since the field of study is critical to human well-being.

Conclusion

The literature search was vital in selecting relevant information for analysing the topic, ‘Ethical Nursing Considerations.’ Specific search terms like nursing, ethical consideration, and professional ethics were used to locate the research works. The search engine and databases used included GoogleScholar, PubMed, JSTOR, and ScienceDirect. The inclusion and exclusion criteria focused on the publication, scholarly review, and relevance were used to seek out the selected sources. The PRISMA Flowchart summarises the steps followed in determining the sources. A critical appraisal was done, under which three papers were evaluated based on several assessments to assert their relevance. The literature searches and evaluation are effective in the nursing field and the selected topic as it helps select works with relevant information and exclude others.

Reference list

Aveyard, H. and Sharp, P. (2017) A beginner’s guide to evidence-based practice in health and social care. 3rd edn. London: Open University Press.

Bramer, W. M. et al. (2018) ‘A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches’, Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), pp. 531–540. Web.

Connell, C. et al. (2022) ‘Mental health nursing identity: a critical analysis of the UK’s Nursing and Midwifery Council’s pre-registration syllabus change and subsequent move towards genericism’, Mental Health Review Journal, 27(4), pp. 472–483. Web.

Ellis, P. (2020) Understanding ethics for nursing students. 3rd edn. London: Sage.

Grant, A., Goodman, B. and Bach, S. (2019) Communication and interpersonal skills in nursing. 4th edn. Los Angeles: Learning Matters.

Haahr, A. et al. (2019) ‘Nurses experiences of ethical dilemmas: a review’, Nursing Ethics, 27(1), pp. 258–272. Web.

Ilkafah, I., Mei Tyas, A. P. and Haryanto, J. (2021) ‘Factors related to implementation of nursing care ethical principles in Indonesia’, Journal of Public Health Research, 10(2). Web.

Nursing and Midwifery Council (2018) ‘The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates’. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council. Web.

Stievano, A. and Tschudin, V. (2019) ‘The ICN code of ethics for nurses: a time for revision’, International Nursing Review, 66(2), pp. 154–156. Web.

Varkey, B. (2021) ‘Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice’, Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), pp. 17–28. Web.